Combating Corruption in the Romanian Public Sector. Normative Framework, Institutional Mechanisms and Systemic Challenges

Authors

  • Alin Ștefan Șpac Ștefan cel Mare University of Suceava, Faculty of Law and Administrative Sciences, Romania

Keywords:

administrative corruption, public sector, institutional integrity, regulatory framework, anti-corruption mechanisms, risk assessment

Abstract

The article provides a critical and integrative analysis of the legal and institutional framework governing the fight against corruption within Romanian public administration, without limiting itself to a mere inventory of the relevant norms or institutions, but rather pursuing the internal logic of this system, its interdependencies, and the structural tensions that weaken it. Corruption is approached not merely as a manifestation of deviant individual behavior, but as the result of a combination of institutional, cultural, and political factors that sustain persistent vulnerabilities. The article highlights how national legislation has evolved over the past decades to respond both to internal demands for administrative reform and to external pressures, particularly in the context of European integration and Romania’s commitments within the European Union. Relevant provisions from key legislative acts are discussed, including regulations on incompatibilities, conflicts of interest, the protection of whistleblowers acting in the public interest, transparency in the exercise of public office, and the assessment of integrity risks. The analysis does not stop at the formal level of regulation but examines how these norms are implemented in practice, with emphasis on the functioning of specialized agencies, the administrative capacity of institutions to implement coherent anti-corruption policies, and the internal mechanisms for control and ethics. In this regard, recurrent obstacles are identified that limit the effectiveness of existing mechanisms: fragmented responsibilities, lack of institutional coordination, weak performance evaluation, political pressure on certain independent authorities, and a low level of commitment to integrity principles at the decision-making level. The article offers a systemic reading of administrative corruption, articulating a theoretical perspective with applied observations on the institutional realities of Romania. The aim is not only to provide a diagnosis of the current framework but also to offer a basis for reflection on potential directions for reform, with a focus on cultural transformation, the professionalization of public administration, and the reconstruction of public trust in the functioning of state institutions.

Author Biography

Alin Ștefan Șpac, Ștefan cel Mare University of Suceava, Faculty of Law and Administrative Sciences, Romania

Graduate of Ștefan cel Mare University of Suceava, Faculty of Law and Administrative Sciences, Romania

References

Balan, L. C. (2019). Criminal aspects specific to corruption offenses. RAIS Conference Proceedings - The 12th International RAIS Conference on Social Sciences & Humanities. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3388062

Ghibanu, I. A., Ștefan, M. C., Andreiana, V. A., & Stoica, G. (2022). The management of the corruption phenomenon and its approaches. Valahian Journal of Economic Studies, 13(2), 67-73. https://doi.org/10.2478/vjes-2022-0016

Guvernul României. (2018). Hotărârea nr. 599 din 2 august 2018 pentru aprobarea Metodologiei standard de evaluare a riscurilor de corupție în cadrul autorităților și instituțiilor publice centrale, împreună cu indicatorii de estimare a probabilității de materializare a riscurilor de corupție, cu indicatorii de estimare a impactului în situația materializării riscurilor de corupție și formatul registrului riscurilor de corupție, precum și pentru aprobarea Metodologiei de evaluare a incidentelor de integritate în cadrul autorităților și instituțiilor publice centrale, împreună cu formatul raportului anual de evaluare a incidentelor de integritate [Government Decision No. 599 of 2 August 2018 approving the standard methodology for assessing corruption risks within central public authorities and institutions, together with indicators for estimating the probability of corruption risks materializing, indicators for estimating the impact in the event of corruption risks materializing and the format of the corruption risk register, as well as approving the methodology for evaluating integrity incidents within central public authorities and institutions, together with the format of the annual integrity incidents evaluation report]. Monitorul Oficial al României, Partea I, nr. 751 din 30 august 2018. https://legislatie.just.ro/Public/DetaliiDocument/204398

Guvernul României. (2021a). Hotărârea nr. 1.269 din 17 decembrie 2021 privind aprobarea Strategiei naționale anticorupție 2021-2025 și a documentelor aferente acesteia [Government Decision No. 1,269 of 17 December 2021 approving the National Anti-Corruption Strategy 2021–2025 and the related documents]. Monitorul Oficial al României, Partea I, nr. 1218 din 22 decembrie 2021. https://legislatie.just.ro/Public/DetaliiDocument/249828

Guvernul României. (2021b). Anexe din 17 decembrie 2021 privind aprobarea Strategiei naționale anticorupție 2021-2025 și a documentelor aferente acesteia [Annexes of 17 December 2021 regarding the approval of the National Anti-Corruption Strategy 2021–2025 and the related documents]. Monitorul Oficial al României, Partea I, nr. 1218 bis din 22 decembrie 2021. https://legislatie.just.ro/Public/DetaliiDocumentAfis/249932

Huther, J., & Shah, A. (2000). Anti‑corruption policies and programs: A framework for evaluation (Policy Research Working Paper No. 2501). World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813‑9450‑2501

Iancu, B. (2021). Hidden continuities? The avatars of “judicial lustration” in post-Communist Romania. German Law Journal, 22, 1209-1230. https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2021.61

Nagâț, V. I. (2020). Considerations regarding the sources of corruption. Scientific Bulletin of Naval Academy, 23(2), 270-277. https://doi.org/10.21279/1454-864X-20-I2-105

Parlamentul României. (2000). Legea nr. 78 din 8 mai 2000 pentru prevenirea, descoperirea și sancționarea faptelor de corupție [Law No. 78 of 8 May 2000 on preventing, detecting and sanctioning acts of corruption]. Monitorul Oficial al României, Partea I, nr. 219 din 18 mai 2000. https://legislatie.just.ro/public/detaliidocument/22361

Parlamentul României. (2003). Legea nr. 161 din 19 aprilie 2003 privind unele măsuri pentru asigurarea transparenței în exercitarea demnităților publice, a funcțiilor publice și în mediul de afaceri, prevenirea și sancționarea corupției [Law No. 161 of 19 April 2003 on certain measures to ensure transparency in the exercise of public dignities, public offices and in the business environment, as well as on preventing and sanctioning corruption]. Monitorul Oficial al României, Partea I, nr. 279 din 21 aprilie 2003. https://legislatie.just.ro/public/detaliidocument/43323

Parlamentul României. (2014). Legea nr. 682 din 19 decembrie 2002 (republicată) privind protecția martorilor [Law No. 682 of 19 December 2002 (republished) on witness protection]. Monitorul Oficial al României, Partea I, nr. 288 din 18 aprilie 2014. https://legislatie.just.ro/Public/DetaliiDocument/41031

Parlamentul României. (2022). Legea nr. 361 din 16 decembrie 2022 privind protecția avertizorilor în interes public [Law No. 361 of 16 December 2022 on the protection of whistleblowers in the public interest]. Monitorul Oficial al României, Partea I, nr. 1218 din 19 decembrie 2022. https://legislatie.just.ro/public/DetaliiDocument/262872

Secretariatul General al Guvernului. (2020). Ghid de bune practici pentru implementarea Standardului 1 - Etică și integritate [Good Practice Guide for the Implementation of Standard 1 – Ethics and Integrity]. https://sgg.gov.ro/1/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Ghid-de-bune-practici-pentru-implementarea-Standardului-1-Etica-si-integritate.pdf

Secretariatul General al Guvernului. (2023). Normele de conduită prevăzute de O.U.G. nr. 57/2019 privind Codul administrativ, cu completările ulterioare [Rules of conduct provided by Government Emergency Ordinance No. 57/2019 on the Administrative Code, as subsequently amended and supplemented]. https://sgg.gov.ro/1/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/NORME-DE-CONDUITA-.docx

Downloads

Published

2023-12-10

How to Cite

Șpac, A. Ștefan . (2023). Combating Corruption in the Romanian Public Sector. Normative Framework, Institutional Mechanisms and Systemic Challenges. Theleologicae International Journal of Postmodern Studies, 3(1), 58–79. Retrieved from https://epejournals.com/index.php/tijps/article/view/69