The Minor in Relation to Criminal Sanctions – Socio-Legal Perspectives on the Fairness and Effectiveness of Applicable Punishments
Keywords:
Juvenile justice, Educational measures, Recidivism, Public perception, Social reintegrationAbstract
The present paper analyzes public perceptions of the sanctions applicable to minors in conflict with the law, as well as the actual effectiveness of the educational measures provided by the Romanian legal framework. Starting from the observation of a persistent ambivalence in public opinion – between the desire for rehabilitation and the tendency toward firm sanctions – the study explores the social and institutional mechanisms that fuel this tension. The influence of mass media in shaping collective representations of juvenile delinquency is examined, with emphasis on the impact of stereotypes and alarmist narratives, such as the “super-predator”.
The evaluation of the effectiveness of measures applicable to minors is structured along three complementary dimensions: behavioral (recidivism and post-sanction conduct), social (community and family reintegration), and institutional (normative coherence and implementation functionality). Each dimension is analyzed in relation to specialized research and to international standards in the field of juvenile justice. The study argues for the necessity of a child-centered approach (“children first, offenders second”) and for integrated interventions that include educational, psychosocial, and family support.
By correlating examples from international literature and analyzing the dysfunctions of the Romanian system – such as the lack of specialized personnel, the inconsistent application of measures, or the deficient cooperation between institutions – the paper highlights the importance of systemic reform supported by evidence-based public policies. It underlines the fundamental role of civic education, institutional transparency, and the professionalization of the actors involved in building a fair, effective, and reintegration-oriented juvenile justice system.
References
Administrația Națională a Penitenciarelor – ANP. (2023). Studiu integrat privind cauzele recidivei la minorii sancționați penal [Integrated study on the causes of recidivism among minors subject to criminal sanctions]. https://anp.gov.ro/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/Studiu-recidiva-minori.pdf
Allen, T. T., & Whitt, A. (2020). An examination of the relationship between media exposure and fear of victimization: Implications of the superpredator narrative on juvenile justice policies. Journal of Forensic Social Work, 71(4), 23–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/
jfcj.12185
Case, S., & Haines, K. (2015). Children first, offenders second: The centrality of engagement in positive youth justice. The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 54(2), 157–174. https://doi.org/
1111/hojo.12099
Dünkel, F., Grzywa-Holten, J., & Horsfield, P. (2015). Restorative justice in Europe (Vol. 1). Forum Verlag Godesberg. https://rsf.uni-greifswald.de/storages/uni-greifswald/fakultaet/rsf/lehrstuehle/ls-harrendorf/Bd50_1_9783942865319.pdf
Eberhardt, J. L. (2019). Biased: Uncovering the hidden prejudice that shapes what we see, think, and do. Viking. https://www.hks.harvard.edu/faculty-research/library-research-services/collections/diversity-inclusion-belonging/biased
Fabian, A. (2010). Juvenile delinquency in Romania: The indirect result of the transition process. https://www.researchgate.net/
publication/49606771
Haines-Delmont, A. (2007). Juvenile crime and punishment in Bucharest, Romania: A public opinion survey. Internet Journal of Criminology. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237702163
Institutul Român pentru Evaluare și Strategie – IRES. (2023). Atitudini și percepții ale populației privind răspunderea penală a minorilor [Public attitudes and perceptions regarding the criminal liability of minors] [Sondaj național/National survey]. https://ires.ro/articol/
/perceptii-justitie-minori
Legea nr. 286/2009 privind Codul penal, republicată în Monitorul Oficial al României, Partea I, nr. 510 din 24 iulie 2009, cu modificările și completările ulterioare. [Law no. 286/2009 on the Criminal Code, republished in the Official Gazette of Romania, Part I, no. 510 of July 24, 2009, as subsequently amended].
Mazerolle, L., Bennett, S., Davis, J., Sargeant, E., & Manning, M. (2013). Procedural justice and police legitimacy: A systematic review of the research evidence. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 9(3), 245–274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-013-9175-2.
Rusu, A. Terec-Vlad, L., (2025). Error of Fact and Error of Law – Implications for Guilt in Criminal Law. Valahia University Law Study. 45(1).
Secretariatul General al Guvernului – SGG. (2025). Strategia națională pentru prevenirea recidivei 2025–2029 [National strategy for the prevention of recidivism 2025–2029]. https://sgg.gov.ro/new/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Strategia-Recidiva-2025-2029.pdf.
Terec-Vlad, L., (2024). Regimul juridic al minorității în dreptul penal. Prouniversitaria.
UNICEF Regional Office for Europe and Central Asia. (2022). Prevention of children at risk from coming in conflict with the law in Europe and Central Asia [Advocacy brief]. https://www.unicef.org/eca/media/27686/file/Five%20Advocacy%20Briefs%20%20on%20Child%20Justice%20&%20Child%20%20Friendly%20Justice:%20Prevention.pdf
